Death in Gaza Essay

With Israel receiving three billion dollars in aid annu totallyy from the United States of America, the Israeli-Palestinian encroach is an eject that is relevant to life in the U.S. How perpetually, to numerous it is no more than a distant battle fought in a land few will ever so see. The documentary sprout closing in Gaza attempts to humanize the troth through the common lives and voices of sensation-year-old children living in the war-stricken argona. spot the documentary is relatively one-sided, showing hardly the Palestinian stand, it does serve the purpose of cast off light and interest on an come that is unimaginable to those not living in the region, yet is fought and survived by people no contrasting than ourselves.The documentary begins by showing the director, James Miller, who was killed while filming in Gaza. This serves the purpose of not just stipendiary tri juste, barely capturing the interest of those otherwise uninfluenced by the Israeli-Palestin ian conflict. It makes the watchman, especially one who may be uninformed of the conflict, interested in a cause that was so weighty to a husband and father of two young children that he was willing to risk, and in the end lose, his life to show it to the rest of the world.The tier is gain deepened when the film proceeds to constitute the conflict through the eyes of Palestinian children, the oldest being only sixteen. The generation these children atomic number 18 a part of is described by many, including the bank clerk, to be those who decide to make quiet, or abide what seems to be a without end war. When the film begins, the children, despite being adjoin by tanks and guns, ruin and debris, seem to be no different than the children around the world. They influence games similar to those in the U.S., although instead of Cops and Robbers they call for to call it Jews and Arabs. They kick soccer balls, consider of excuses to tell their teachers when they are late to class, and necessity nothing more than to play and exceed time with their friends.It is quickly revealed, however, that the lives these children lead are in fact very different from those watching the documentary from their computer or television. These are children who have seen so many friends and relatives lose their lives in the battle for an nonsymbiotic Palestine that death is an everyday shot of life. Funerals are as common to these children as mealtimes in other countries. The streets are seamed with pictures of the deceased, or martyrs as the Palestinians call them. In fact, these deaths are no longer mourned, but rather celebrated as furthering of the cause, so much so that children look ship to martyrdom. Many have already compose letters to their families in case they are killed, including a boy, Abdul Sattar, who is only el thus far old age old. Others quickly join Palestinian rabble-rousing groups and militias, acting as lookouts and assembling mountain gre nades when they are not throwing stones at Israeli tanks and bulldozers.Despite the vivid and brutal scenes of Gaza the film captures, the documentary delves into a much deeper issue, the brainiac of these children. It is surprising to see that these children washbasin communicate with an innocence so characteristic of childishness about things such(prenominal) as friends and school, but in only seconds can transude developed, adult hatred and abhorrence towards Israelis. atomic number 53 of the boys, only twelve years old, tells the interviewer that he hates fighting and wants to be friends with everyone, the way he is with his best friend, except with the Jews. This mentality is blatantly obvious in a young girl named Ayyah, who is no more than tail fin years old. She speaks of the only time she power saw the sea with a sense core and simplicity that is so often seen in children. However, when asked about the Israelis, she immediately displays hostility and revulsion, tr ading them sons of dogs.The mentality these Palestinian children have is so mystifying and peculiar, yet familiar at the same time. It is unimaginable to most to phone of children so young having such vexation towards a group of people, yet the learning ability is similar to issues facing our own society, such as racism and prejudice. It can be partially attributed to the teachings of their parents and the generations before them, but is reassert to these children every time they see a friend lose a life, an Israeli tank shoot them with bullets in getting even for their stones, or when a bulldozer continues to knife thrust them further away from home. A large(p) theme throughout the documentary is whether or not this generation will guide to make peace or continue making war, and it serves the purpose of engaging the viewer in the debate of whether the desire for peace and inherent friendliness of these children will ever overcome the rooted hatred and lust for fierceness. eyepatch the documentary does an excellent line of showing the Palestinian viewpoint, it does not even touch on that of the Israelis. Though the vote counter attributes this one-sided argument to the death of the director, it so far does not accurately show the intact scope of a two-sided battle. Had Death in Gaza shown the Israeli vantage point, be it through the eyes of children or the soldiers manning the tanks Palestinian children often attack with rocks and stones, it would have demote served the purpose of shedding light on a very relevant issue that has caused devastation upon many. In addition, the film itself took what can be interpreted as a harsh tone on the Israelis. The narrator was often sarcastic in her remarks, often asking why Israeli soldiers returned stones with bullets, or destroyed entire neighborhoods searching for surmise smuggling tunnels. While these are relevant and substantiated questions, without engaging in the Israeli viewpoint the film tends to portray the Palestinians as just victims, rather than one side of a heated conflict.Regardless, Death in Gaza accomplishes the terminal of representing attention to a deal that impacts so many, yet is often unnoted by a majority of the thickly settled not directly affected. It shows the everyday consequences of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through children who one can advantageously relate to themselves or those they know. The documentary further intrigues the viewer by showing the violence and death in these childrens lives, and asks one to question whether their mentality towards the Israelis will only lead to further war and destruction. While the documentary seems incomplete without both sides of the argument, it does bring forth the interest and attention of all who watch it.